Scalia and gay marriage: How the justice misunderstands morality.

My Wag: Scalia would have made a great dictator. He knows how everyone should behave and he knows how to F-with those who don’t.

Scalia and gay marriage: How the justice misunderstands morality..

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.
Justice Antonin Scalia appears on “Fox News Sunday” on July 27, 2012. Scalia robs morality of its intellectual component, equating it to what people simply don’t like.

Photo by Paul Morigi/Getty Images

In a speech last week titled “Mullahs of the West: Judges as Moral Arbiters,” Justice Antonin Scalia told the North Carolina Bar Association that the court has no place acting as a “judge moralist” in issues better left to the people. Since judges aren’t qualified—or constitutionally authorized—to set moral standards, he argued, the people should decide what’s morally acceptable.

But does Scalia, whose quarter-century on the bench has marked him as the court’s moral scold for his finger-wagging views on social issues, have a coherent understanding of what it means to say something is or isn’t moral, and of morality’s proper role in the law?

Scalia would have you believe it’s liberal, pro-gay sympathizers who are imposing their own brand of moral laxity on the nation, and unconstitutionally using the courts to do it. His angry dissent in the 2003 Lawrence v. Texas case ending sodomy bans—decided 10 years ago this week—blasted the court for embracing “a law-profession culture that has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda [which is] directed at eliminating the moral opprobrium that has traditionally attached to homosexual conduct.”

Advertisements

Court opened door to $933 million in new election spending | The Center for Public Integrity

My Wag

Citizen’s United. It sounds quaint…but it ain’t. This country is about money and business. If you have a different idea just ask the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court

Court opened door to $933 million in new election spending | The Center for Public Integrity.

The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision unleashed nearly $1 billion in new political spending in the 2012 election, with media outlets and a small number of political consulting firms raking in the bulk of the proceeds.

Spending records released by the Federal Election Commission show that throughout the 2012 election, corporations, unions and individuals that could take advantage of the high court’s ruling were responsible for about $933 million of the estimated $6 billion spent during the contest. Continue reading